What to expect from next year's MWC?
It's hard to argue 2008 wasn't the banner year for the Mountain West. Three teams finished in top-25, two in the top-ten, with Utah coming in at second nationally. But what can the conference do for an encore and will next year's results mimic what we saw this season?
Those questions will dominate the discussion as we enter the spring & summer months, but it's an answer that will have to wait until the season actually gets under way. This is the case because while talent does return at the very top of the conference, it's also being shuffled out, with Utah, TCU and BYU losing key players on both the offensive and defensive sides of the ball.
The champions, Utah, probably have the biggest question marks, as they lose a bulk of their offensive production, two key defensive stars and the best kicker in school history. Those players won't be easy to replace, however, Utah's strength, even with the losses of Paul Kruger and Sean Smith, is still their defense and that should keep them competitive, especially when conference play rolls around.
But will it be enough to give Utah a preseason top-25 ranking? Well most previews for next season, however early they may be, suggest Utah will fall anywhere from 25th to 9th. But it remains to be seen if this buzz will stay the further we get from the Utes' surprisingly easy victory over Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.
Another team that can make the case for the championship is TCU. The Frogs finished the season 11-2, with their lone conference loss coming to Utah, in Salt Lake City. Many people thought the Frogs were the best team in the conference and gave the Utah game away. Debate aside, TCU looks to be the favorites next year, if only because their conference schedule is more favorable than Utah's, though it should be noted they have to travel to BYU and what they return.
Speaking of BYU, their losses might be the most damaging. The biggest is Austin Collie, Max Hall's favorite receiver this season and the player that made the Cougar offense tick all year long. Without that option, their offense could fizzle, especially since they have to rebuild most of their offensive line. That could pose some nightmare scenarios for Hall, who buckled under pressure in all three of the Cougars' losses. It isn't a coincidence that Hall's three poorest games came against the three toughest defenses BYU faced all season. With an opener against Oklahoma -- whose Heisman winning quarterback will return -- and a home game against Florida State, that line is going to be tested early and often. If BYU struggles out of the gate, it could snowball into something pretty nasty.
Of those three, I think BYU has the least room for error, but mostly because this is the season to get it done. A season not unlike Utah's and if they can't next year, then when? In fact, I think BYU now stands at a similar position as the Utes did in the offseason. It was a question I asked here on Block U, though more in the terms of conference championships instead of BCS berths. I knew Utah would be good, we all knew Utah would be good and if Kyle Whittingham couldn't produce a championship with this team, then would he ever? Well we know Bronco can win conference titles at BYU, but can he take it to the next level and produce a season where BYU becomes the non-BCS darling? This appears to be a now or never situation facing the Cougar football program, which means everything is on the line and if they let it slip away, the climb back to the top will be harder than ever.
The Cougars do have some things going for them, though. Max Hall is a good quarterback and if he can become as mentally tough as John Beck in his senior season, their offense should be extremely scary. Couple that with their favorable home schedule and it's likely they can lose to Oklahoma in week one and go undefeated the rest of the way, which would position them for a BCS bowl bid.
For Utah, they have a favorable out of conference schedule, as Oregon looks to be the only possible loss. Games against San Jose State, Utah State and Louisville, the latter two at home, should be victories. That sets up nicely for the Utes as they enter conference play and hopefully the success they gain out of conference carries over and Utah picks up where they left off at the end of this season.
When it's all said and done, I expect the Mountain West to probably take a step back. Out of the top-three, TCU seems to have the best chance of going undefeated, though a very easy out of conference schedule will kill any chance of playing for the national championship. BYU could make some noise, especially if they manage to upset Oklahoma, but they have got to figure out what to do with their defense if that is going to happen. As for Utah, I expect a better rebuilding season than what we witnessed in 2005 and if all goes to plan, the Utes should be playing for the conference championship well into the final month of the season.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A small step back.
I am more interested in the outcome of the Jun 6th meeting when the topic of expansion is reopened. Boise State would be a tremendous asset to the MWC. The time is right, though they won’t play in the MWC in 2009 in any case.
As a conference the MWC needs to win 2/3 of the out of conference games. I think the bottom of the MWC (SDSU) will pick up some of the slack and the top will do well also.
The MWC should have two teams starting in the top 25. If the MWC wins at that pace and Utah, TCU or BYU go undefeated a national championship game might be on the horizon. Typically I argue that a MWC team needs to start in the top 15 to have a chance but Utah’s win opens the door to a top 25 start for a MWC team.
It is more likely that a one loss MWC team makes a BCS bowl, which would also be an historic event. A BCS Bowl win by a one loss MWC team, especially if it was a conference loss, would be HUGE for the conference.
Who is everyone losing?
Here is what I think I know about who is coming back next year:
Utah returns the following starters: 3 OL (Taylor, Hoff, Beadles), 1 RB (Asiata), 2 WR (Reed and Brooks), 3 DL (misi, talimaivao, eliapo), 3 LB (sly, fotu, wright), and 2 safeties (Johnson and Dale). Big losses are QB, DE, CB and OL. If our replacement OL gels quickly I think we should be fine on the other spots. Of course, can’t underestimate what Brian did for us. Need a good decision-maker at QB.
BYU returns 1 OL (Reynolds), 1 RB (Unga), 1 TE (Pitta) and their QB (Hall) on offense. On defense they return the entire DL (at least, I think so. The only starter I know is Jorgensen), 3 LB (only loss is Nixon) and 2 DB (they lose Fowler and Taufuna). They might also return some WR with starting time, I’m not sure who started. Reed and Collie are gone. That’s a lot of offensive production to replace. Unga’s good, but won’t be able to run wild behind a new OL, and Hall struggles with pressure. By the end of the year they should be good again, but they’ll struggle out of the gate. Like Utah, the defense should actually be the strength of the team, at least early.
TCU returns their QB (Dalton), 3 OL (I think they just lose one starting guard and a tackle, but I could be wrong), and most of their WR (they lost two, but neither are big stars). Biggest loss on offense is Brown. On Defense they return 3 DL (out of 5) unless Hughes goes pro, 0 LB (out of 2), and 2 CB (no safeties). There are a ton of big losses here, even if Hughes stays, including 3-year starting DT Moore, all-MWC LB Phillips, all-MWC LB Henson, all-MWC S Hodge, all-MWC S Coleman, etc.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
TCU's returners on the line
You’ll hear, all offseason, that TCU loses three starters on its offensive line. That’s only half true. The center, Blake Schluetter, graduated (with his wife) and is gone. Preston Phillips and Giles Montgomery, two guards, are gone, too. However, Phillips was passed up by Josh Vernon early in the year, and Vernon was passed up by the true frosh Kyle Dooley, who had an amazing year. I don’t know how much Dooley started, but he was clearly on the first team OL at times, until a knee injury late in the season. I know Vernon started the season opener.
So, I except TCU to start Newhouse (returning LT), Vernon (returning LG), Kirkpatrick (junior at center, never started), Dooley (RG, played on the first team at LG), and Richmond (returning RT).
A plausible reading of that line is that only Kirkpatrick is a new starter.
What about Raetz?
Again, I don’t really focus on the OL of teams we’re playing (normally) so I don’t know who your starters were, but I thought Raetz was the starter at OT and was gone now.
Not saying you won’t have a good OL. Whether it’s one or two, it’s still not 4 like BYU. Man I wish Kruger had come back to terrorize BYU’s brand spanking new OL. Oh well.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Jan 15, 2009 4:43 PM MST up reply actions

by 






