TCU report card
I was unsure if I wanted to actually think about the contest enough to grade it - but I think it's needed. I didn't grade the New Mexico game because I spent most of last week hyping up this one and it's hard to just forget it ever happened. It did happen and though I don't think the loss is crippling, it certainly exposed some issues that will have to be corrected if the Utes are going to return to the top of the Mountain West next year and even win the Holy War and their bowl game this year.
What I do know is that nearly everything pretty much failed Saturday. It was ugly. Extremely ugly from the point Utah tied the game up at 7-7 and it never really got any better. Rarely have we seen our Utes get completely whooped for the entirety of a game. What happened Saturday was just that and more. It was probably the worst defeat we've seen out of Utah since failing to Rice in 1996 (I guess there is something about Texas schools). Hopefully we have to wait at least another ten years before witnessing something this ugly again (ideally, it'd never happen, but that's unlikely).
Regardless, Utah is still 8-2 and the season has not been lost. The next two weeks and the bowl game will go along way toward easing the pain Saturday caused.
The grades for TCU after the jump...
Offense: C - The offense wasn't good. With that said, they could have been a lot worse. Unfortunately, I still think there are some major issues that need to be addressed. They start with the offensive line, which failed at protecting Jordan Wynn for most of the game. Granted, Jerry Hughes and TCU's defense is quick and sick, but there is no excuse for their total lack of protection in that game. It was embarrassing how quickly things went to hell once the ball was snapped.
On the other hand, Wynn handled it pretty well. He took the sacks and did throw an ugly interception, but much of his struggles Saturday were due to the offensive line and not his own doing. Had they provided him a bit more protection, I think the offense moves a bit more than it actually did.
Beyond Wynn, the only other two offensive players I was impressed with were David Reed and Shaky Smithson. Beyond them, though, everyone else was Missing in Action.
Defense: D-minus - Ugly! The defense was probably the worst I've seen since that Rice game I mentioned earlier. Giving up 55-points is ridiculous and I don't care if that came against the 4th best team in the nation. Kyle Whittingham teams do not give up 40-points in many games, let alone allow a team to crack a half-hundred.
Granted, much of their struggles came from the special teams forcing a short field, but there is no excuse for that performance. They were dominated nearly every time TCU had the ball and on a few key drives (namely the first of the game and the one right after Utah scored to tie) were far too easy.
This defense has been pretty good all season and it collapsed Saturday. I was shocked at how badly they played up front and how poor they were once TCU moved into the secondary. I don't know if it was entirely about the plays or the effort, but something has to change before BYU or the Cougars will have no difficulty moving the ball on Utah.
Special Teams: F - Do I really need to get into all the special team deficiencies? Yeah, I didn't think so.
Coaches:
- Aaron Roderick: C - Hard to get a read on the play calling when you're facing such a tough defense. I didn't think it was entirely bad and the fact the Utes struggled sustaining a ground game probably didn't help. As I said earlier, much of their struggles on the offensive end began with the line and the blame there falls at the feet of Blake Miller.
- Kalani Sitake: D - I think there is some obvious growing pains here. Sitake is not at the level Gary Andersen was as Utah's defensive coordinator and definitely not nearly as good as Whittingham. But this is his first year and because of that, I've got to think things will improve the more experience he gets. At least I hope so.
- Kyle Whittingham: C-minus - I think this might be the lowest grade I've ever given Whittingham. I fault him for the lack of energy out of the gate. The Utes came out looking listless and it cost them early. Whittingham has padded his resume with wins in big games, so I was shocked to see how scared and uninterested Utah looked from the start. TCU took it to the next level and Utah didn't. That is rare for the Utes.
Overall, I was disappointed with the effort. TCU is a very good team (maybe the best in the nation), but I can't say we're bad enough to lose by nearly 30-points to them. Certainly we could have held them to a respectable offensive number and even that didn't happen.
There were some bright spots on the offensive end and I do have confidence Wynn can move the ball against weaker defenses (cough, BYU), but the defense does have me concerned. And right now, that's something I never thought I'd say. It really is a foreign concept for Utah football.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I gave them a D. i was hoping for a competitive game. But TCU was really good, i don’t know what else to say
Jazzy, giving up 55 points is bad
but the loss to UNLV is so much worse than this one.
TCU could go down as the best MWC team ever, and while it sucks how we lost, there’s no shame in losing to them. There wasn’t a single redeemable thing about the loss to the Rebs (unless you include, for whatever reason, what’s occurred since then).
St Louis Game Time: Let's Go Blues!
Block U: a blog about the University of Utah
You can find me on the twitter: @achidester
Concur...
now that was an “F” game if this program has ever seen one.
However, this one was a sold D- though. Great TCU team or not.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
Maybe...
But in the context of both losses, this one stings more. Back in 2007, we were okay, but not great. We were plagued with injuries and had yet to reach our potential under Whittingham. After that loss, I was more angry than anything else. It sucked, but at that point, Utah football was hardly at any decent point (the year before, they lumbered to a rather pedestrian 8-5 record).
Granted, it was on the heels of a huge upset over UCLA, but it doesn’t change the perception. It was a bad loss in what many thought was going to be a bad season after Utah lost to both Oregon State and Air Force. We knew the potential for that season was questionable even before it began and to watch it unfold in Vegas hurt, but it wasn’t like this.
I mean, I was probably angrier at that loss because of who it came against, but the program had reached rock bottom and it kinda felt like that was it for Whittingham. In my warped mind, the loss signified to me that change was probably coming at the end of the year and then we rebounded and I was proven a fool.
This time, though, it was different. Maybe because it happened on the national stage and expectations were extremely high (even if you didn’t have Utah winning, we all thought if they did lose, it’d be by a respectable margin). It proved more than anything that this year the Utes were coasting on cupcake teams and have some real issues that need to be addressed or – like in 2007 – we’re going to face a real ugly loss. Granted, that might not happen due to the fact there are only three games left, but it could carry over into next year. I doubt it will and have faith Utah will be really good in 2010, but that doubt will linger.
It’s just, in my mind, harder to accept that after what we accomplished last year. UNLV wasn’t fully expected, but it didn’t seem entirely out of place with what we had done under Whittingham up until that point.
This loss, though, was so un-Whittingham like that it made it far more harder to accept. And yes, I get that it came against one of the best teams in the nation. But that doesn’t make it any easier. Especially when the margin of the loss has a lot to do with problems of our own doing.
Even in the context of what Whittingham was at that point
there’s no justification for getting shut out by UNLV.
They were 2-10 the previous season. Sanford had two conference wins in two seasons to his credit. Utah had an 11-game win streak against that program. And especially with how Mack, RoJo, Kruger, and Sylvester emerged against UCLA, we should win that game. Period.
I know it’s how you feel, and I can’t change that, but I don’t understand how this loss to TCU stings more. There were a lot of past indicators that perhaps suggested Utah could win this game (record as a ranked team, match-up against TCU, record over the last 29 games), but we Utah fans were the only ones who couldn’t accept that 20-point line. Everyone else ate it up.
Maybe it just comes down to my point-of-view on TCU. From the opening kickoff, they forced the issue and took it to us. They’re a damn good team with speed, strength, balance, discipline, and hunger. The numbers ain’t pretty, but at least they’re a great team. Looking at that UNLV game, that’s 100% on Utah. We got shut out by a team quarterbacked by Travis Dixon and coached by Mike fucking Sanford. 3/14 on third down, 1/5 on fourth down, and 6.6 yards per carry to Frank Summers.
I think it’s safe to say Utah will finish no worse than 2-1 to finish the season, and knowing Utah will achieve double-digit wins and finish the season ranked between 20-25, makes me feel ok about the TCU loss. Even with everything we’ve accomplished and learned since the UNLV game, it still upsets me.
St Louis Game Time: Let's Go Blues!
Block U: a blog about the University of Utah
You can find me on the twitter: @achidester
Hey...I never tried to justify the loss.
But I was far more depressed after this loss than the UNLV one. That was more anger than anything else. This was like being smacked around, pissed on and left for dead in the middle of Death Valley.
haha
After the punt block gave the Utah D an incredibly short field after it looked like the game could be back and forth, it appeared from my angle that a lot of the wind got knocked out of the Utah defense. It’s hard to get that emotional energy back, and as a result, penalties started flowing which gave TCU’s offense more time to get into a rhythm and feed off a crowd that was pro-TCU like no other in TCU’s long history.
I was impressed with Wynn, he got crushed, got up and looked deep again. He’s going to be a special player for you guys, and I’m not looking forward to playing y’all on the road next year. Things went sour early and the emotional momentum lodged itself firmly in TCU’s corner, after that it was all over but the shouting. I think Florida would’ve been blown out in a similar situation, so it’s hard to fault your D too hard for the same.
Football and basketball are the two sports that thrive the most on momentum.
One play or shot or score could totally alter the flow of the game.
TCU had momentum heading into this game because they were better. They had it because they were at home. They had it because of the hype and energy created with GameDay being in Fort Worth and the first real sellout in years (I hesitate to say the Tech game was a ‘sellout’ in this sense since a good number of fans there were TT fans).
When that punt was blocked, it really changed the game.
We saw something similar against BYU last year. The Cougars had stayed with the Utes for a good portion of the first three quarters and then Hall threw a pick to Kruger, who nearly ran it back for a TD and the Utes scored on the very next play. It broke open the game and the momentum heavily swung to Utah.
It happens. The Utes did not weather the storm very well. But it isn’t surprising. Our special teams, specifically punting, has been questionable all year. When you go against a great team, those problems are easily exposed. They were then and it cost the Utes.
Would we have won had that punt block never happened? No. But it probably would’ve been a bit more of a game. Unfortunately, Utah was slaughtered in that 2nd quarter and no team is ever going to recover from a beating like that.
I can't understand...
how anyone would grade that game a B or a C.
There are either a lot of smart asses here, or people just didn’t watch that ass whippin’ close enough.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
Yeah...I'm trying to figure that out as well.
Especially the B, since that was a joke option.
Well so was A, but people have the sense to not vote for that one.
For the record, I voted D.

by 










