Five questions entering the USU game
Certainly we have our doubts about whether these Utes are built for another great season. Unfortunately, we probably won't have an idea whether that's the case until week three (though we could know if it isn't the case). Which means these questions surrounding Utah will be mostly left unanswered for a bit.
With that said, it's possible to get an idea of the answers sooner rather than later and as we enter the 2009 season, I'm hoping this is the case. Because I definitely don't want enter the Oregon game essentially wondering where the season is going. Though I guess it's possible Utah sits at 0-2 prior to their game with the Ducks and then we'd most assuredly know in that case. But that's unlikey. Or so I hope.
So what are the biggest questions for these Utes and can we expect at least a half-answer by Thursday night?
- Quarterback play. The Utes won't have a starter named until the game, which means right now, a lot is unknown. Of course, that isn't a bad thing. From all reports, Terrance Cain has performed fairly well and though Jordan Wynn went from hyped starter to probable backup, he's still steady enough in practice to keep Cain grounded a bit.
- Offensive changes. A new quarterback is only half the issues the Utes will be dealing with on offense. They also have an inexperienced play caller in Dave Schramm - which could create more kinks. If Schramm does take a bit to adjust to his new role, expect the play calling to be rather average in the first couple of games. Hopefully, they hit their stride by week three.
- Defensive changes. This transition should be easier, though Utah still has to replace Sean Smith and Paul Kruger. Both losses will hurt, but the biggest concern might be with replacing Gary Andersen. Like Schramm, Kalani Sitake has never been a coordinator and there might be a learning curve. Though Whittingham's defensive background should ease potential issues.
- Hype. How does Utah handle their newly found celebrity? Yeah, they're not the it team right now (BSU seems to be), but all eyes will still be on them as they try to follow up the 13-0 campaign. As 2005 showed, the fall can be hard when everyone - especially in conference play - is gunning for you. The bottom line - Utah will be the biggest game on each team's schedule outside Oregon and maybe Louisville. Can they handle that?
- Consistency. One thing that can hurt an inexperienced team is their lack of consistency. I don't think this will be much of a problem Thursday, but it could be an issue next Saturday. How does this tie into the USU game? Well if the Utes can come out and slam the door on the Aggies early, it might show they're capable of not playing down to their opponent. If that's the case, I think we'll all feel a bit more confident heading into week two. If they struggle - even through a win - there could be some doubts.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Questions
No one really knows. There are so many major changes on this team that you know that there will be good things(better play calling?) that come of it and bad things(turnovers?). All you can do is hope there is more good things than bad things.
by utahmanami on Sep 1, 2009 2:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Pretty much.
There has been a lot of change on offense, so really, we don’t know what to expect.
Cain could suck.
Wynn could suck.
Schramm could suck.
Or all three could be the second coming of Smith, Johnson and Meyer.
We’ll find out soon enough!
by JazzyUte on Sep 1, 2009 2:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heck. . .
I’m glad of two things:
1) we’re already a success by getting out there last year and knocking it out, and being ranked pre-season.
2) that we’re not being considered too highly as to make expectations even higher, the pressure worse, and any issue more glaring.
by MeanBobMean on Sep 1, 2009 8:38 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
My take...
I touched on this a little bit on my last post but I think one of the biggest question marks outside of QB will be how Special Teams performs, and I’m not just talking about Kicker. Think about it. We have a freshman punter, a freshman long-snapper,a freshman holder, a freshman playing return man and a talented (yet inexperienced) place kicker in Ben Vroman. I bring this up because Utah had a lot of mental mistakes last year against USU with Special Teams, I just hope we’ve plugged the holes, so to speak.
by GambitUte on Sep 1, 2009 12:32 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
As far as the QB question goes......
I believe very strongly it’s Cain, even though he has yet to make a Division I snap,I think his JC experience will be an easier transition than Wynn’s at high school.
As for Coach Whitt’s decision to keep it under wraps, i think some people are reading into it too much, Just because we don’t want to name the starter, that doesn’t mean it’s because of uncertainty.
I really wish the best for Cain (if it is in fact him) and I hope he will be just as great as BJ (which I realize is no small feat).
by GambitUte on Sep 1, 2009 12:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Cain plays all year . . .
Wynn can Redshirt, matures, bulks up, learns the system more . . .
Yeah, that works for me.
by MeanBobMean on Sep 1, 2009 7:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 









