Utes and Falcons have had an extraordinary rivalry # 8 Utah (7-0) @ Air Force (5-3)
No team in the Mountain West has given Utah as much of a fight like the Air Force Falcons have done for years now.
If there has been one constant in this ever changing rivalry, it's that each game generally comes down to one or two plays. It's been like that since the 1990s and continues to be like that even though Utah has really eclipsed the Falcons program over the last six years.
No matter how good the Utes are or how bad Air Force looks, each game has proven to be a battle. Yet, even though the margin of victory has been razor thin at times, Utah has lost only once to the Falcons since the start of the 2003 season. That happened in 2007 and fittingly - it was on a last second defensive stop.
That's just how these two teams roll. Throw away the records and even home field because when they get together, the games are never a blowout.
Even in 2004, when Utah wrecked everyone they played, they still found themselves in a dogfight with Air Force. That game they actually trailed 14-0 early and though they put them away earlier than normal, it was still the closest any team came to derailing the Utes' undefeated season.
In 2008, the undefeated Utes needed a last minute drive to get out of Colorado Springs with a victory. Had it not been for Darrell Mack's nine-yard touchdown with less than a minute left, all the magic of that year maybe never happens. No BCS, no Sugar Bowl win over Alabama and certainly no 13-0.
That was a tough, ugly game for Utah. The fact it was close shows just how much trouble Air Force has given the Utes over the years. Statistically, Utah dominated the game. They held Air Force to 191 total yards - one of the worst offensive performances in school history.
Yet three turnovers and a 16-0 Falcon second quarter made this game closer than it ever should have been.
The Utes trailed 16-9 at the break and finally came alive in the second half, outscoring Air Force 21-7.
Of course, one of the closest contests in this series happened last year. Utah entered that game ranked 19th nationally, but had yet to really find any offensive flow. That was obvious throughout the game, as Terrance Cain and crew struggled to produce sustainable drives.
The Falcons actually out-gained Utah 318 to 267 and led 10-6 heading into the second half.
This was a game where it looked like the Utes were going to blow it open in the third quarter when Cain found David Reed for a 91 yard touchdown pass - but it was only false hope. Air Force managed to score the next 6 points the remainder of regulation as Utah struggled moving the ball the rest of the game.
In overtime, it was a dramatic finish. The offense actually came alive and moved the ball well enough to position Eddie Wide for a one yard touchdown run. After making the extra point, the pressure then turned to the defense and they got a huge stop on fourth and one to preserve the overtime win.
It was an exciting finish and one that really illustrated Utah's core problems in 2009. They really had a hard time consistently sustaining anything on the offensive end. They weren't awful, but they weren't anywhere near as good as they have been this season.
So, what changes in 2010 - if anything? Can the Utes finally do something that they have not done since 2004 and win by two or more scores?
I don't know for sure.
What I do know is that the years Air Force has been down (2004, 2005 and 2006), only that 04 team managed a comfortable win. In 2005 and 2006 (both of which were 4-7 seasons for the Falcons), the Utes won by three points each. The latter of which came on a Louie Sakoda field goal as time expired.
So even though the Utes are 6-1 recently, their margin of victory throughout that span is about four points. Less than one touchdown. That's how close this series has been over the years.
The interesting thing about this match-up is that from 2003 to 2005, it was very offensive oriented. Both teams averaged over 30 points throughout that stretch and the games were often track meets, with both teams piling up the points and yards.
That ended in 2006, though. The Utes, as I mentioned, won that game as time expired on a field goal. But they only won 17-14. It wasn't much different in 2007, as the Falcons nipped Utah 20-12 in Salt Lake City.
I've gone over the 2008 and 2009 meetings. Both not very high scoring and both left to the defense more than the offense.
Will that change Saturday?
Utah certainly has the offense, but one thing Troy Calhoun has done with Air Force, which wasn't always the case under Fisher DeBerry, is established a solid defense. They've had some stout defenses over the last two years - but that's not necessarily the case this time around.
The Falcons give up 22 points per game on average, which isn't terrible, but far from their 15 a year ago. The issue, though, is the 371 yards given up a game. That's not a very good stat when you consider in 2009, they gave up almost 100 less.
But they do have a good defense. Probably the best defense Utah has faced since Iowa State (really). That's not saying a lot, I know, but it will indicate how much upside this Utes' offense really has.
Overall, this is going to be a good game. The Falcons fight and they rarely ever lose in a blowout. The fact this game is in Colorado Springs helps. But I'd be lying if I said I felt it helped enough to give them the win.
This Utah team is very, very good. They have an unbelievable ability to really just turn it on offensively. That's going to be the difference between this Ute team and the ones who have struggled at times recently against the Falcons.
Utah wins if...They play up to their potential and don't turn the ball over. Turnovers, in this atmosphere, will kill the Utes. They've got to secure the ball. They do that and they win. I believe it is that simple.
Air Force wins if...The Utes overlook the Falcons toward their showdown with TCU and are caught napping and revert back to being the turnover machine we saw against Wyoming.
What will happen...Utah does something they haven't done in program history - they win comfortably at the Air Force Academy. They won't crack 50 this week, but they'll still look pretty impressive, winning 42-17.
Bold, I know. But I'm feelin' it. What are your predictions?
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The UTES are not over looking AF...
For all the reasons you stated and… It is the gate way to TCU. If need to, and think we will, put AF away in convincing fashion (>5 flags, scoring <35 points, >3 punts, 0 turnovers, <2 takeaways, and giving up >17 points). This game is going to show us more about our Defense than our O.
GO UTES!
I'm rubb-n my boots on your couch bitch! - Dave Chappelle (AKA Rick James)
I may be a bit neurotic, and I apologize...
But I think you need to switch your signs around.
" > " = Greater than
" < " = Less than
Its a personal tick of mine, sorry.
by Hockey Beard in SLC on Oct 26, 2010 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions
AF is good, and I think Whit and Meyer have trouble game-planning them
We’ll win comfortably, but not resoundingly. 35-17. Then we will be solid dogs going into TCU and there will be money to be made in Vegas when we win!
If we're as good as we think we are...
which is to say, as good, if not better, than TCU, then we shouldn’t have too much trouble with AF. After the first quarter it didn’t look like the Frogs were sweating bullets. That said, we’d better not overlook them because if there’s any team that can bring down the Utes this year (other than TCU) it’s AF.
I think Jaziggy is about right on the score for the Utes, but I’d like to see us hold the cadets to 10 or less. Yes, I dream big. (and that’s why I’m sooo let down by the Phillies)
Can anyone say they've had success in stopping us?
Air Force kept it close with TCU for about a half (17-7).
Colorado St. (6-0)
SMU (14-10)
Oregon St. (21-14)
BYU (17-0…ok, that’s a stretch…)
…other than Pitt, has anyone come out of the half thinking they have a shot? TCU is not the overwhelming favorite that the media is making them out to be. All the better though…we’ll look that much better if we dominate.
Also, the one time they played at altitude (CSU), they had their lowest scoring game of the season. This is a CSU D that just gave up 59 points. Between the rotation of the D line wearing them out, and the altitude sickness, I really wonder about TCU’s ability to put points on the board.
Ok, enough looking forward to TCU…sort of…
Even though I don’t expect it to be close, I think the Air Force game will give us a more definitive look at how we measure up vs. TCU.
We think we stack up to TCU on D…but they just held one of the top rushing offenses (326.50, and that number would be higher if not factoring in the TCU game) to 184 yards. 47 yards passing.
We need to be below that to feel as confident as we do right now. Currently we boast a better run D than TCU (though only by about 15 ypg), so that, in theory, should be our strength.
I don’t think AF will put up more than 10 against our first team, and we’ll score 35 with our A squad.
Final score 45-17.
I also think the line vs. TCU won’t be more than 3 1/2 in TCU’s favor. They’ve already lost their shirt on those of us betting for Utah every week.
Hard to compare head-to-head...
For starters, Utah has historically struggled with the Falcons and that hasn’t really indicated much of anything in the recent trend of things. In 2008, Utah beat Air Force by 7. TCU? 34 points.
Likewise, BYU, prior to this season, appeared to be a team that thrived against the Falcons. They generally scored at will on them, kept their wishbone in check and that never really meant much of anything against either Utah or TCU. In 2008, the Cougars beat Air Force, at Colorado Springs, 38-24 – a more impressive score than the Utes.
Beyond that, TCU played ‘em at home. Utah is playing them on the road. That’s always a tough environment, which explains the Frogs’ three point win last year. They struggled against Air Force and it didn’t mean much of anything in the end.
So yeah, I’m not too keen on looking at head-to-head. It gives you an idea, but not a definitive idea. If Utah wins by only six, I don’t think it means they’re doomed to lose against TCU. Likewise, if they win by fifty, I’m not sure it means they’ll easily beat TCU.
Just different match-ups and games. I do agree it should give us a better idea, but remember – Utah barely beat New Mexico a week before the TCU game in ’08 and, well…
Any given Sunday...or Saturday...
Sure, I get it…
What I do see trending from the TCU standpoint is that they seem to struggle at altitude.
As for why we have struggled…I have speculated that it may have to do with catching Air Force early in the schedule (2008), and of course just being a difficult team to prepare for.
…and 2008, we had to overcome Andy Ludwig in most of our games.
Very good points...
I agree. It’s easier to play AFA at the end of the season than at the start.
But even toward the end, Utah has historically struggled against the Falcons compared to other opponents. So I’m not going to get too upset if we narrowly win and I certainly won’t read too much into it.
IF Utah goes out there and breaks the trend of close games, though, I can’t say it won’t make me a bit more confident heading in to the TCU game.
I'm pretty confident right now...
TCU’s D is strong…but their offense doesn’t make me scared…
…it seems like the D keeps TCU’s Offense on the field for such a long time that by the 3rd Q they’re just worn out. That’s why games that are close at the half get blown wide open, and not because they’re just overpowering.
I don’t see that happening vs. Utah. We’ve got the altitude, and we’ve got enough weapons, and our special teams are going to keep TCU pinned back, if we’re not able to score.
…my only concern, is everyones concern…turnovers.
Utah should win comfortably
Air Force has too many key injuries. They might keep it close but I think we’ll pull ahead in the second half.
Air Force could be insane though, this is their BCS game. But, I won’t hedge, I’ll say we win by at least ten, and Jazzy’s prediction sounds fair enough.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman

by 












