Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

Hey, Utah's actually playing on real national television

The last few years, Utah has struggled with exposure. In 2008, it was the big reason why no one really bought into their ability until their huge Sugar Bowl win. This season, the biggest game in Mountain West history found its way to CBS College Sports. A sports channel that is part of a special sports package and though they offered up a free preview last week, how many casual sports fans actually knew they were getting it? I'm guessing a very small few.

Likewise, Utah's final major conference Holy War will take place on...the mtn. Not Versus. Not CBS College Sports. Not a simulcast of the three. No, it'll solely be played on the mtn.

This is a big reason why I can't wait for next year. Yes, next year (and next year only), it looks like some of Utah's games won't be broadcast on any television and that will hurt. But I think that's the price you pay for the big games, the Holy War and conference showdowns against ranked opponents, to be broadcast on ESPN, ABC and yes, even FOX Sports. 

This hasn't happened for the Utes since 2005. That was the final year the Mountain West had a contract with ESPN and ABC. In 2006, the formation of the mtn. created an entirely new template of what not to do when it comes to getting the best exposure for your football programs. 

That's not to say it's all been bad. Since 2006, almost every Utah game has been aired in some form. That was something you could not get ten years ago. 

Star-divide

But at what expense? Was it really worth not having a game on ESPN or ABC? I'm not so sure and that definitely won't be a problem come next year. If both SC and Utah are ranked heading into their first conference showdown in Los Angeles, you better believe that game is going to be regionally aired on ABC.

The last time the Utes played on ABC? UNLV in 2005. That's quite a long time and though the program has survived and actually bettered itself throughout the blackout period of 2006-2010, you've got to wonder what they could have done if the Mountain West still had ties to ESPN. 

The Oregon State game in 2008 comes to mind. That was a Thursday night game. It was always going to be on a Thursday and probably would have been picked up by ESPN had the network owned some rights to the Mountain West games. What type of leverage does Utah get out of beating the Beavers, who a week prior had defeated #1 SC, on ESPN? It certainly would have dominated that night's sports news. Similarly, the Utes played TCU on a Thursday night that season and that game most assuredly would have been broadcast on ESPN had the conference not severed its ties with that network. 

At that point, it was the biggest game in Mountain West history. Yet it only aired on Versus and I'm guessing a great deal of potential viewers were lost because of it. 

Of course, playing on ESPN wasn't perfect. Boise State is seeing this first hand. Two weeks ago, they played Louisiana Tech on a Wednesday and this week, they play Idaho on a Friday. 

That type of scheduling is bad for programs. It's bush-league. In that regard, the Mountain West did something about the poor scheduling. But I'm not so sure it justifies removing the conference entirely from the national scene and for the last four years, that's exactly what has happened.

Now that is no longer a problem. The Utes are heading to a conference with a much better television deal. They'll have one game on Thursday next year (the season opener against Montana State) and the remainder will be played on Saturday. A few of those games will take place on real national television. Just as tomorrow's game will.

It'll be a nice break from big games being played on stations people don't even know they have. It'll be nice knowing next year, each major home game has the potential of being on ABC or ESPN. In 2005, that was the case. But by 2010, our big opener against Pittsburgh found its way to Versus. 

If the Mountain West wants to be taken seriously over the next few years, they've got to figure out a better television deal. If they don't, the conference is going to continue struggling in the eyes of many because they won't have a legitimate platform to air the conference's biggest games. 

Next year, unless a miracle happens, the big showdown between TCU and BSU will take place on CBS College Sports. 

That is ridiculous. Thankfully for Utah, they're almost done with that type of big game scheduling. Saturday's contest will be on NBC. Then it's only two more games until another real national television audience watches the Utes in a bowl game. After that, the mtn. is officially irrelevant to Utah. 

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Speculation on the new TV contract for the Pac-12?

I’m familiar with the large dollar signs attached to the game, but who is going to sign, and what is it going to mean for future broadcasts? Exclusivity with that network? Will ABC/ESPN still be able to pick up games?

Any thoughts?

by Middy_U on Nov 12, 2010 4:00 PM MST reply actions  

My money is on ...

Comcast on verge of acquiring NBC has the means and the needs for additional sports programming on Saturdays in the fall. Fox Sports is doing all it can to be a serious threat to ESPN.

Let’s not forget that Comcast is the cable provider in most PAC-12 viewing markets. Through its cable outlets it has the built in distribution network and with NBC it has the production know-how. As a fan the downside to Comcast may well be the ensuing bickering and fighting with the satellite companies similar to what we saw with the .mtn. That could, if history repeats itself, result in fewer homes with access to the games.

Once Comcast has NBC in its pocket it will have the ability to quickly put together the PAC-12 network. Getting the PAC-12 would provide them with disparately needed programming that will allow them to add advertising and subscription revenue to help pay for the NBC deal.

In the end it will come down to the money – and need. ESPN doesn’t NEED the PAC-12 nearly as much as Fox or Comcast will and therefore won’t be high bidder. I don’t think Fox can provide the benefit of quickly assembling a PAC-12 Network that will surely be a lynch pin of any TV deal.

You can probably tell that my money would be on Comcast.

"It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word" - Andrew Jackson

by uteowl on Nov 12, 2010 5:01 PM MST reply actions  

Damn! I wish there was an edit button...

because Comcast doesn’t disparately need revenue, it desperately needs revenue.

Maybe my signature should also say “It’s a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word” – or use it!

"It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word" - Andrew Jackson

by uteowl on Nov 12, 2010 5:09 PM MST up reply actions  

Pac-10 comparison

Cal (a probable 6-6/7-5 team) has/will have all 12 games televised this year: 9 on FSN/CSN , 1 on ESPN, 1 on Versus, 1 on Fox College Sports. AFAIK only Washington State has had any games not televised, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn the same of OSU, being the two smallest markets. One of the first things Larry Scott did was modify the current TV contract such that it’s easier for a network to pick up an uncovered game for a lower price, whereas under Hansen the conference wanted more money which just resulted in fewer games televised. So even under our “bad” contract relative to the new one we’re looking forward to, there’s still almost universal coverage within Pac-10 states (nationally with the right FSN packages, etc).

by GBB4188 on Nov 12, 2010 6:16 PM MST reply actions  

Pretty sure...

the OSU-BSU & OSU-TCU games were televised.

Eros, Ares, Apollo, Zeus, DIONYSUS, Priapus

*Bring on the Nublies* -- _The Stranglers_
Rice-Eccles - Site of the 1st Pac-12 CCG

by Ravenous Ute on Nov 12, 2010 6:54 PM MST up reply actions  

I should clarify. MOST OSU/WSU games are televised, but they’re probably the only schools in which individual games don’t get televised. Like Wazzu-Montana St. or whatever.

by GBB4188 on Nov 13, 2010 2:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Get To See Game For Free

I am glad that ND has a contract with NBC so I can see it over the air. As I don’t have cable or sattelite right now it will be nice. I hope local stations can pick up the games that the networks and cable channels don’t want.

The goal of every Ute fan should be to caffeinate Cosmo's punch and watch him self combust.

by Happyvalleyute on Nov 12, 2010 6:48 PM MST reply actions  

KJZZ..

…used to have a contact to carry Utah BB games.

I’m sure they would love to step up to the plate for untelevised Utah football games next year.

Eros, Ares, Apollo, Zeus, DIONYSUS, Priapus

*Bring on the Nublies* -- _The Stranglers_
Rice-Eccles - Site of the 1st Pac-12 CCG

by Ravenous Ute on Nov 12, 2010 6:51 PM MST up reply actions  

According to Matt Sarz Sports the Holy War will be simulcast on CBS College

It freakin’ better be since I don’t get the mtn up here in Seattle

by kadoogan on Nov 13, 2010 9:21 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

THIS IS HORSE SHIT!!!

I can’t believe we didn’t show up for 2 weeks in a row. Just when BYU fans were starting to shut the hell up, now we have to listen to their crap for the rest of the month!

by GatorUte on Nov 13, 2010 4:05 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"I can't think of many schools that are better than Utah."
- Urban Meyer


"Wow. Wow. Wow."
- Daryl Johnston after Utah took a 21-0 lead on Alabama in the 2009 Sugar Bowl