Where I come from: Our expectations for 2010
This post is sponsored by NCAA Football 2011 and is part of a week-long series that will further introduce Utah football.
Utah enters its final season as a non-BCS program in a few months. It's a historical leap that hasn't happened since the BCS formed in 1998 (Cincinnati, Louisville and South Florida were all replacement members when they departed for the Big East) and because of this transition, I expect this year to be of the most emotional and hardest seasons in recent Utah history.
So many rivalries have been built over the decades among Mountain West schools. Beyond just BYU and Utah, the Utes have a history with the Wyoming Cowboys, Colorado St. Rams and New Mexico Lobos. These teams have been duking it out in some instances since the old Skyline Conference. But come November, Utah will officially play its final conference game with some very familiar conference foes.
What awaits is unknown. We expect the Utes to do well in the newly expanded Pac-12 - but that's all speculation.
What we do know is that no team in the Mountain West has achieved what the Utes did over the span of the last eleven seasons. We're the only team in Mountain West history to play in two BCS bowls. We're the only team in Mountain West history to finish second in the nation. We're the only team in Mountain West history to go undefeated since the conference formed (and hell, we did that twice). Sure, there were some down years (2000, 2002). But overall, as Phil Steele put it, Utah has been the Mountain West team of the decade.
I suspect Boise State or Texas Christian will claim that title in the next decade. But for the entirety of the conference, Utah took the Mountain West to heights no one ever could expect. Especially from a program that ended its play in the WAC only managing one conference championship in a thirty year span.
That will be the storyline of the year - one of the programs that helped establish the Rocky Mountain Conference, then the Western Athletic Conference and eventually the Mountain West Conference, is now leaving for their delux apartment in the sky.
Everyone will be gunning for Utah. Go check out rival forums. Even though the Utes did nothing wrong, there is a new hatred for the program. Probably because they don't see us as one of them anymore.
We're now BCS and each game will be treated as a contest between the non-BCS and the BCS. So I expect every team will get up to play Utah. Though we're used to that. They did it in 2005 after we bulldozed our way through the conference and they did it again last year. The fact the Utes have been the most successful program in the conference nationally means that generally, you'll get their best game. I don't want to make it sound like I'm conceited - but it does make sense. Beating Utah carries a lot more weight nationally than beating Wyoming.
Of course, I expect TCU to find a similar target on their back. But in the end, it won't be nearly as large because, when it's over, they're still one of them and we're not. When November rolls around and the final seconds tick off the clock at Rice-Eccles Stadium against BYU (hopefully a win), we're officially done with the Mountain West and they're officially done with us. Nothing we do, even if we make the BCS or national championship game, will count for the conference. It now all rolls over to the Pac-10.
Because of this, I know we're in for a tough season. But I also think the Utes want to go out on a high note. They're not just content with getting their invite to the Pac-10. This isn't about mailing it in and then coming back in 2011 to establish the program as something more.
Kyle Whittingham will have his team ready.
I'm just not sure it'll be enough for a great final season. Maybe a good one. Maybe even a near-great one. But if it's going to be great, the season will come down to the following games:
Pitt
TCU
@ Notre Dame
BYU
Three of those four games will be played at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Utah should be favored in two of those four (Pitt and BYU). That leaves TCU and Notre Dame as the biggest games of the season. Pitt is up there because it could set the tone for the Utes' season from the start - but I'm not sure it's as big as TCU and Notre Dame.
You could also add Air Force.
Ideally, the Utes win 'em all. That probably isn't going to happen, though. So, as I've said a few times this spring and summer, I think 11-1 or 10-2 are realistic predictions.
What do you think?
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
I would add to the list of tough games...
Iowa State (beat Nebraska last season)
Wyoming (gave us a hard time at Rice Eccles last season)
Air Force (always plays tough)
Pitt and TCU will be the toughest games. Pitt has two stand out guys on defense that will be rushing Jordan Wynn on every play. They return most everyone on defense. On offense, they have an exceptional WR (Jonathan Baldwin) and RB (Dion Lewis) and they have another RB who may get some carries. They will be starting a new QB who got to play a little bit last season, but probably has less game experience than Wynn. Pitt had to replace a lot of guys on their O-line which will help out the Utes.
TCU will be a very good again this year. They lost a lot of guys that were play makers (i.e. Marshall Newhouse, Joseph Turner, Ryan Christian, Nic Richmond, Jerry Hughes, Rafael Priest, Nick Sanders, Daryl Washington, Corderra Hunter…). However, they return a lot of the guys that gave us trouble last season (i.e. Antoine Hicks, Jeremy Kerley, Jimmy Young, Tank Carder, Wayne Daniels, Kelly Griffin, Tejay Johnson, Evan Frosch, A. Dalton, Marcus Cannon, Tyler Luttrell, Curtis Clay, Skye Dawson, Bart Johnson, Luke Shivers, Matthew Tucker, Ed Wesley, and a few other starters). They will be extremely deep at the WR position (at least 6 guys saw play time last season) and at TB. They took at hit at CB position losing both of their starters Priest & Sanders. Ryan Christian (WR) was very good the last few years against the Utes, so his departure will help. Joseph Turner was very good at TB, but Tucker & Wesley easily replace him. Newhouse and Washington were stars on their team last year and they are gone. Jerry Hughes created serious problems for Jordan Wynn, so it’s nice that he has left. I think that our defense will need to be prepared to stop the run (especially right through the middle), stop the QB scramble (which was used a lot last season), and cover their receivers (who will most likely be Hicks, Kerley, Young, Bart Johnson, and Clay… Skye Dawson not as likely… most throws to Hicks, Kerley, and Jimmy Young, sometimes to Clay and Johnson). Air Force, Boise State, and Clemson had success against TCU’s offense last season holding TCU to 20, 17, and 14 points respectively. Interesting note: Utah put up more points against TCU last season than any other team they played.
Wyoming loses 7 starters.
Air Force loses 12 starters (6 offense, 6 defense).
BYU loses Pitta, Hall, Unga, Tonga, and others.
Notre Dame? Have to wait to see them play the first few games.
Notre Dame
I saw that Notre Dame has their bye week right before the Utah game, so they will have some extra time to get ready for the Utes. If you go to youtube or to the ND football site you can see clips of the blue/gold spring game. They look pretty good from what I can see. They have Dane Crist and Nate Montana (Joe’s Kid) fighting it out for QB.
They have talent
And the best coach they’ve had since Lou Holtz left.
They will be extremely tough by the time we play them.
Yeah . . .
I think we have an extremely tough schedule this year and I’d say 10-2 would be a great outcome. Any less and, depending on how we lose, I might be disappointed—any more wins and I will be quite happy.
I'll go ahead and predict a 9-3 season...
with another bowl victory of course.
I think this team has a lot of upside and could certainly exceed that record, but I do think there are some tough games on the schedule that will be difficult to pull off. We shall see.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
Something like 9-3, 10-2
I expect Utah to win at least one of these games, if not two: Pitt, TCU, Notre Dame.
I expect Utah to beat Iowa State, even though it’s at Iowa State because frankly, they’re not that scary of a match-up.
I expect Utah to beat BYU because Utah’s team should be better than them this year, and dammit, it’s time for another win against them.
Honestly, I could see Utah dropping a game in conference that they shouldn’t, just because there will be no love for Utah this year and because it happened so many times in 2005-2007. Maybe the last two years have shown us that Whit has figured out how to avoid those losses, but there were some close calls last year and I just don’t see the non-TCU/BYU portion of the MWC schedule as automatic wins.
So I’m expecting 9-3 or 10-2 but I would love to be surprised.
I think Pitt's every bit as big for you
because a) they have the national rep (and winning those early games that the pundits have decided are important matters more than it should), and b) they just aren’t going to be nearly as motivated to beat you as the MWC will. I think you really need to win that one to give yourselves a cushion if/when you lose one you “shouldn’t have.”
As for ND, South Bend is a big home-field advantage, but for my part, at least, I’m just not a believer in that team. And I say that as a resident of northern Indiana who has ND season-ticket holders in his congregation. Maybe I’m overly affected by their wariness and cynicism, but if Kelly does turn that program back into a real contender, I don’t think it’s going to be an immediate boost like they saw with Ty and Weis. (Which, of course, may mean it lasts a lot longer, too.)
by The Ancient Mariner on Jul 12, 2010 10:47 AM MDT reply actions
3-1 in non-con
I do think Utah has the talent to go 4-0, but 3-1 is realistic with the most likely loss to most Pitt or less likely Notre Dame. In conference I have a tough time Utah beating TCU, Air Force is always tough and its in Colorado Springs, and for some reason SDSU on the road gets me nervous even though it should not. The Holy War is nearly always a toss up but I see the Utes being able to pull that one out. 8-4 is worst case scenario where best is 11-1.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
It will be interesting to see how Utah does against Pitt. I think we have a pretty good chance of beating them. But Utah has a tendency to be sloppy in their first game.
by CRIMSONandWHITE on Jul 13, 2010 9:53 AM MDT reply actions
I think that's generally the case for most teams...
But to put it into context, Utah in their first game of the season in the Whittingham era:
Arizona: W
@ UCLA: L
@ Oregon State: L
@ Michigan: W
Utah State: W
So 3-2 with zero losses at home (though a stretch of three consecutive seasons began on the road). Four of those games were against the BCS. The only really bad game was UCLA – as the Oregon State fiasco was mostly due to injuries.
Breaking down the schedule I think 10-2 or 9-3 are realistic expectations. So where do the losses come from? I think Utah loses to TCU, even though it’s a home game. They got blown out last year and needed a miracle finish and help from TCU’s FG kicker to beat the Horned Frogs during the Sugar Bowl season. Right now, TCU has a third year starter, in senior QB Dalton, and always has one of the best defenses in the country. It would be an upset if the Utes won that game.
So where does another loss or two come from? The most likely possibilities come from Pitt, ND, and BYU. Out of those, I think BYU is the easiest, but it is the Holy War and is always down to the last series it seems like. BYU may have extra motivation, as well, in the form of a PAC 10 send off. But still, the Utes win simply because BYU loses all of their skill guys and their top pass rusher from last year.
Pitt will be a great game. I really could see it going either way. If Utah can’t stop the run, like they couldn’t up the middle against TCU, it will be a long game for Ute fans. Utah had four players on the defensive side of the ball get drafted last year. They’ll be tough to replace. All LBs are new starters too. We kind of know what they are going to bring, and it is talented. The question is, can we stop it?
ND is the biggest unknown. They had top 10 recruiting classes from 06-08. Those kids will now be juniors and seniors. We’ll see if the potential translates into on the field talent and wins. Their coach is like an Urban Meyer, taking off-the-radar programs and turning them into BCS teams. We’ll see if he can work magic in a big pond like Urban did at Florida. ND also has a bye the week before the Utah game, while the Utes will be recovering from TCU. And it is in South Bend.
To be honest, I could see Utah losing to both Pitt and ND, but I definitely think they could win both too. I don’t think Utah drops a game to Wyoming, Air Force, Iowa State, SDSU, or CSU, but it could happen. When Utah went 10-2 in ‘94 they beat all the ranked teams they played and were 8-0 to begin the season but lost back to back games against New Mexico and Air Force. Anything can happen. So a 9-3 season wouldn’t surprise me, nor would an 11-1. Anything more or less would be a surprise. We’ll see how things start to form as the season progresses and we know more about each opponent.

by 










