One week and the fun begins
Fun, of course, should mean a Utah victory. I don't think a loss would be fun. They never are, right? So maybe I'm going out on a limb here when I say the fun will begin. It could read the fun might begin - but that's not very decisive. I want to be decisive and not appear weak. So we'll keep it as it is and hope that, in the end, it is when the fun will begin.
In seven days, we'll have a better idea of how good this team really is. Personally, I don't have the faintest idea of what to expect from the 2010 Utes. Well that's not entirely true. I do expect a winning record, a bowl berth and contention for the Mountain West. However, outside of that, it's all virtually unknown.
This season, more than any other, is very similar to 2008. Now I know what you're thinking, back that up Jazzy because that team went 13-0 and it's hard to ask for something similar out of this team. You are absolutely right. I'm not suggesting these Utes will go undefeated. I'm only saying their potential is pretty high and that means a lot. Especially if they can live up to that potential.
Of course, the truth is, none of us knew what to expect out of the 2008 Utes. We knew they had a chance to be really special, but that's just it - all we could do was speculate. Certainly the program under Kyle Whittingham hadn't established itself as a team with the potential to go undefeated.
That's why 2010 reminds me of 2008. The prospects for a really good season are there. Especially now that Whittingham has created a consistent winner here.
But on the other side of the unknown is a dark and scary place. It's a season of struggle. That's where 2008 differs from 2010. We knew then they would be really good. Potentially great. But we also knew there wasn't much chance of them playing worse than our expectations. Not with the talent they returned. Not with a senior quarterback.
This year, though, those guarantees aren't there. We don't have a senior quarterback to fall back on and certainly not an experienced defense to carry an offense if they peter out.
But in seven days, I think we'll have our answer. I say think because you can never be sure if the opponent is worthy of its preseason hype. Beating Michigan in 2008 proved absolutely nothing and it wasn't until the Utes defeated Oregon State a few weeks later that it became clear we had a really good team on our hands.
Pitt should be different, though, because I do believe, unlike Michigan in 2008 or even Louisville in 2007, they are worthy of their preseason buzz. So Thursday should tell us what we need to know about this Utah team.
A win might not answer all the questions, but it will answer most of them. Likewise, a loss might not answer all the questions, but it should answer most of them. And isn't that what you want out of a season opener?
Last year, we didn't really know how Utah stacked up until their game against TCU - at the end of the season.
That shouldn't be the case this year. Beat Pitt and we'll know this team has the potential to be really good.
All that begins in one week.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Defense
It all comes down to how the new starters in our defense have taken to their roles. I find some comfort in the fact that this is a Whittingham team, and he knows how to coach defenses in to powers.
GO UTES!!!
I definitely agree, it does come down to defense. There are so many gaps in our linebackers that I am worried if Pitt gets the running game going early it will be difficult to stop. The offensive line needs to hold their ground and give Wynn enough time to make smart decisions.
The key to Pitt is Dion Lewis, stop him and Pitt is forced to rely on a freshmen quarterback in a hostile environment.
All I know is, I may be in TN, but the classroom I teach in is decked out in Utah memoribilia and I will be watching the game with my wife and dog all decked out in Utah gear. GO UTES!!!
I cannot wait to not have to watch football on Versus or the MTN ever again!
I just upgraded my satellite package to get Versus and the MtN out here in California. It is so ridiculous what you have to go through to get to see the games, but that is all coming to an end… Not only will It be easier to watch them on tv, but I cannot wait until i only have to drive 40 minutes to see the Utes crush UCLA. I hate the Bruins so much. My wife and I were in the Rose bowl the last time the Utes played them there (2006) and watched a sad game surrounded by gloating Bruins fans. And while the 2007 game at RES was awesome, I have been waiting for the Utes to play them in the rose bowl again.
Do you think KJZZ will get back into the picure?
I’d hope that ALL games will be available at least locally. Back in the day, it was KJZZ that filled in the gap for all games not shown on ESPN, etc. Do you think they or one of the other local stations can throw their hat in the ring?
by fountainofute on Aug 26, 2010 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions
Okay, how is KJZZ preferable to the mtn? If you think the production values of the mtn are bad, remember the 2008 broadcast of the USU-Utah game? It made the mtn look like it was fully professional.
Also, the mtn is available in all parts of the country. When I lived in Washington, DC, I loved the mtn because I saw almost every game.
Agreed with DC. Please no KJZZ. Their production quality is still stuck in the 90s.
I’m pretty sure they’ll allow local stations broadcasting rights like back in the old WAC and early Mountain West days.
It’s entirely possible KSL could be an option for Utah in the future (especially if BYU stays in the MWC).
Maybe my memory is not so good...
I don’t remember KJZZ being any worse than the MTN. I don’t recall KJZZ having zoobs honks breaking down the Utes at halftime.
My larger point is, I hope I can see every game. I don’t care who broadcasts them, as long as all 12 games are available somewhere. And these days, HD should just be expected.
by fountainofute on Aug 26, 2010 2:18 PM MDT up reply actions
I hope Larry Scott is proactive enough that no games would need to be shown on KJZZ.
ABC/ESPN for the highlight games (or NBC/CBS/FOX network if one of them wants to expand their sports programming and it’s a better deal).
ESPN2 for the backup games.
ESPNU/ESPN3 for some games.
FSN-type network for everyone else. There are 12 teams, so probably a maximum of 8 games a week in home stadiums (where the PAC 10 TV deal will control). There are 8 channels (including all the ESPN options plus 2 FSN channels), we should be on real TV every week.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Aug 26, 2010 1:12 PM MDT up reply actions
That would be funny.
Utah on KSL with national announcers and BYU on the mtn.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Aug 27, 2010 5:40 PM MDT up reply actions
This is going to be a fun year
Like you said, Jazzy, there is a funny balance of certainties and unknowns. I’m oddly more nervous for @ AFA , @ ND and @ ISU than I am for Pitt, TCU and BYU at home. I expect us to go 3-0 in those home games. It’s the road that may trip up our young D and QB.
Also, I’m very anxious to see Wynn. Have we fans hyped him up too much this summer? Is he really as good as we hope/remember?
I think our running game is going to be deadly this year. On “O,” that’s the one thing that helps me sleep peacefully is that I think teams are going to kill themselves stopping our run. Even if our air game is average, D’s will be on their heels from Widiata.
As for the D, we’ll just have to see. I’m probably leaning heavily on the mythos of KW’s defensive genius, but I’m not losing much sleep over the D.
Iowa State doesn't worry me too much...
AFA scares me more than anything because it’s a conference game. Notre Dame is tough, but it’s not a must-win (I actually think, if Utah goes 11-1 and their lone loss is to ND, they’ll go to the BCS).
Air Force, though, is if you want to win an outright title.
Pitt is also a game that scares me because it’s an opener and there are questions. We don’t know how good this team can be. If they beat Pitt and then AFA, though, they will be undefeated and a top-ten team heading into their game against TCU.
That’s when it will all be on the line.
Depends on how Notre Dame does.
If we lose to a 3-9 Notre Dame team because we play badly, then we’re outside looking in. If we lose to a 10-win Notre Dame team, I think you’re right, we’ll get an at-large (I think this will be the first year where an undefeated Utah would be ranked behind an undefeated Boise, and I think the same is true for an 11-1 Utah and an 11-1 Boise (if Boise loses to ACC champ VA Tech, not if they lose to 8-4 Nevada).
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
by displacedute on Aug 26, 2010 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions
i was watching college football live and they were saying that dayne chist is just perfect
for brian kelly’s spread offense. i’m not so sure. they guy had complete reconstructed knee surgery. knee injuries have a way of recycling themselves on big hits when running a spread offense.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 29, 2010 7:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Here's hoping
The D is something of a concern, I agree. With all that new talent we could have some early letdowns and against Pitt? They’ll rip us if we miss assignments.
But the offense . . .after last season’s failure to achieve consistency. That is what I am most interested in seeing.
all i got to say is make tino sunseri throw that ball at night. stack the box for lewis.
make the new qb beat us. i don’t think he can. especially if we get a couple of sacks against him.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 4:12 PM MDT up reply actions
Yeah
Well, if we contain their running game ot the point they have to throw all night?
I like our chances.
the line in vegas has gone form -2.5 when i took it to 4 points now.
i took it 2 weeks ago.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 1 week till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 26, 2010 5:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Tailgating tips?
I was just looking over our home rec the last few years, and I was surprised with how good we’ve been under Whitt. The last home loss was against AFA in 2007, and I’ll give the team a pass on that because we were reeling from the catastrophic injuries at that point. We will win the Pitt game because it’s at home, and RES will be poppin’.
Does anyone know a good place to tailgate (or pregame activities) where you don’t have to pay for parking or be a Crimson Club member?
by GodisBrianJohnson on Aug 26, 2010 4:22 PM MDT reply actions

by 









