Utes ranked 24th in preseason Coaches Poll
I am actually a bit surprised they were ranked to start out the season. But I'll take it! For the first time in program history, the Utes will open consecutive seasons ranked in the top-25.
Last year they were 18th to start the season (where they essentially finished).
TCU is the only other Mountain West team ranked at 7th. Pitt is 15th. You can see the total poll after the jump...
2010 preseason poll
Team (first-place votes)
Nebraska
Oregon
Georgia Tech
North Carolina
Georgia
Oregon State
Utah
West Virginia
Others receiving votes
Cincinnati (12-1) 135; Houston (10-4) 76; Brigham Young (11-2) 66; Arizona (8-5) 65; Mississippi (9-4) 48; Clemson (9-5) 44; Stanford (8-5) 41; Connecticut (8-5) 40; Notre Dame (6-6) 38; South Carolina (7-6) 38; Washington (5-7) 26; Missouri (8-5) 23; Navy (10-4) 12; Oklahoma State (9-4) 11; Boston College (8-5) 10; Michigan State (6-7) 10; Arizona State (4-8) 6; California (8-5) 6; Texas Tech (9-4) 5; South Florida (8-5) 4; Texas A&M (6-7) 3; Northwestern (8-5) 2; Temple (9-4) 2; Central Michigan (12-2) 1; Mississippi State (5-7) 1; Nevada (8-5) 1; Northern Illinois (7-6) 1; Southern Methodist (8-5) 1.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We sure have grown as a program!
It is wonderful to see the Utes consistently ranked in the top 25. It is lining up to be awesome year.
I still think we should be ranked higher...
Or should have been ranked lower last year.
We lost much more talent across the board after 2008 and yet somehow managed to start the season ranked 18th. We finished 18th – suggesting maybe our preseason ranking wasn’t entirely off.
A 10-3 campaign with a win over a BCS program (a good BCS program at that) leads to a worse ranking to start the 2010 season – when overall, we’re probably improved over last year.
The good news is that Utah will have a chance to surge up the rankings if they beat Pitt.
Presumably
it’s because the voters think other teams have improved more than the Utes. The context doesn’t stay static, after all.
by The Ancient Mariner on Aug 6, 2010 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions
Last year
voters were apologizing for ranking us like 6th at the end of the season after everyone called them idiots for doing so.
This year we lost too many defensive gems. No one loses that many defenders to the NFL and comes back the same so they are waiting to see what we have.
I’d agree that this year looks, on paper and in theory, to be a better year for us team wise.
it sets up perfectly for utah as long as we beat pitt. which i already have wagered on.
we would be in the high teens when we win that game and hopefully iowa state can win a few games in the weakened big12 before we get to them.if we did have a dream season we could get as high as 4th in the country as long as tcu wins all there games. plus i’m expecting bosie state to win all their games too. they would still put a 1 loss sec or big 12 team in front of us.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Glory favors the bold. Chance favors the prepared mind. Luck, well i have that too. University of Utah goes to the Pac-12 conference in 2011. I expect them to compete immediately for the conference CG. I still will always follow the Mountain West Conference. Brock Lesnar will defeat Cain Velasquez and face the winner of Junior Dos Santos vs Roy Nelson (the winner will be jds by brutal ko)where he will defeat JDS and stake his claim as pound for pound champion. Womens MMA, the next big thing in sports. 4 weeks till the first game of college football. UTAH vs Pitt. September 2nd 2010.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Aug 8, 2010 3:08 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm a little perplexed about Texas and Florida
I know those schools think their replacements to Tim Tebow and Colt McCoy will do well to fill their predecessors shoes but #3 and #4? that’s seems a little high. I guess that what happens with big name schools.
Hence Oklahoma
Being ranked in the top 10. They lose Sam Bradford (Which technically happened towards the beginning of the season, and finished unranked, but manage to be ranked #8.
I would say preseason polls mean nothing, but they unfortunately have a large say in which 12-1 team goes to the NC. Not usually an issue, but we see it become one when a top team like Florida (Or someone else) loses midway through the season to unranked Ole-Misses and manages to stay in the top 5 ahead of an undefeated Utah (For illustrative purposes). Wait. That happened??
I don't pour beer on Max Hall's family often, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.
Alabama, Florida and Texas are ranked based on reputation and coaching
Those rankings are not really related to returning talent, as all three schools lost some very significant pieces.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
Pitt is gonna be a good game.
Way to open the season. I hope the home-field advantage puts us over the top and that Pitt, because they have to at least rank one team from each BCS conference, is slightly inflated.
We’ll see. Best case is that Pitt is underrated, and Utah is even more underrated.
GO UTES! Can’t wait for the season to start.
I don't pour beer on Max Hall's family often, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.
Would love for Pitt to go 12-1...with that one loss coming to Utah.
IF we beat Pitt, especially soundly, I think it’ll prove we’re capable of winning all our games. Not saying we will – but it’d help!
Random question...
Has Thretton Palamo joined the football team this fall? He’s the former Utah rugby star.
No, next year.
He has some academic things that have to be straightened out before he can play division IA scholarship athletics (remember, rugby is a club sport at the U).
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
I'm no longer in the place I consider home (Cache Valley)
I am displaced to Vegas right now, although I was displaced to Virginia when I picked the name.
Everyone hates a pink-shirt-wearing communist.
Texas, Florida, and especially Alabama overrated
The only team in the top 5 that doesn’t have major questions is Ohio State. ALA lost all but 2 starters on defense I think, and FLA and TEX have lost just as much, most importantly at QB. This is a year where I truly think the best teams in the country are Ohio State, Boise, and TCU. Those are the only complete teams I see and they are ranked way too low.
by GodisBrianJohnson on Aug 7, 2010 12:57 AM MDT reply actions
Still have question marks
Ok, maybe my hatred of Bama and Saban in making me biased, but they have 2 returning starters on D, and the rest of the squad is all sophs and Jrs who have never played. That means they are unproven, and I can’t see why you would rank a team #1 when you haven’t seen 10 of the players on defense play in a game.
They might be great, but in the SEC, offense does not always travel so the defense will have to carry them and I’m not sure that many inexperienced players can. Here’s the other thing, their last 6 SEC opponents have a bye before playing them. They’re not going back to the title.
by GodisBrianJohnson on Aug 8, 2010 1:58 PM MDT reply actions
I don't know
If Utah can reload at D, I bet they can. Alabama has basically 4 starters returning because their nose guard, Chapman, plays so much on the line he’s the same as having a starter.
Hightower is a great talent and leader, they use a lot of guys on their line and so most will have significant game experience.
Besides, like Utah, their offense looks to be improved greatly through experience and last year folks said their Offense would suck, yet it was better than 2008’s..
I dont know why...
We do preseason rankings at all. I hate them with a passion. I see absolutely no reason how past season performance should have any influence over how we are ranked, and anyone with a brain knows that preseason ranks effect where you are ranked by the end of the season.
A team who starts at 1st will stay at first as long as they keep winning. Even if an unranked team like Utah runs the table and goes 12-0, beating 4 ranked teams by the end of the year, they won’t be able to jump 1-loss teams like Florida/OU, especially if their losses come in the 1st half of the season. Even an 1-2 team who was initially ranked high will probably stay ranked until they lose their 3rd game.
We have essentially narrowed the field of NC contenders to about 12 teams, without playing a single game in the season. No matter how well anyone out of the top 12 teams do, they will not be able to jump someone with the same record as those teams that are placed ahead of them. And any team not in the top 12 won’t be able to jump any 1-loss team in the top 12 despite staying undefeated.
Teams should not be ranked by anyone until all the OOC games are done, and more like 6-7 weeks into the season. Otherwise all the bowl games are already decided pending the outcome of the season. That seems backwards to me.
The only way to beat it though is to go undefeated and destroy your bowl opponent. Then you have bragging rights forever. I guess that is what really counts anyway.
GO UTES!
I don't pour beer on Max Hall's family often, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.

by 










