Four weeks later, still no offensive coordinator
Utah's search to replace Norm Chow continues to be painfully slow. Outside last week's news that Gary Crowton interviewed for the job, there has been a blackout of information.
No hint of any other candidate - or even an end date to this decision.
What we do know is that the potential (read hopeful) list of candidates is slowly being whittled down by outside sources.
Mike McCoy, who was Utah's quarterback in the 1990s and a dream candidate of sorts, could be the next head coach of the Miami Dolphins.
Dirk Koetter was just hired by the Atlanta Falcons as their new offensive coordinator.
Steve Fairchild, whose name was batted around after he was fired by Colorado State, is now an offensive assistant with the San Diego Chargers.
Last month, I asked readers who they wanted to replace Norm Chow and the favorite, though with a plurality of support, was Aaron Roderick. It seems, at this point, if it were Roderick, he would have been named already. Maybe that isn't the case and he'll still be the next offensive coordinator, but why the long wait? It's not like promoting Roderick will negatively impact recruiting like passing him up could (which might be the reason they're waiting until after signing day).
Regardless, the lack of names is a bit surprising, especially when, a few weeks ago, Kyle Whittingham hinted that a good number of candidates had shown interest in wanting the job.
Weeks later, and only Crowton's name has been linked to the position.
Either Whittingham is good at keeping things under wrap or we've been had.
Regardless, it's likely most the names mentioned initially are not realistic candidates. My guess, from what I've heard, though nothing definitive or concrete, is that the candidates are probably still Roderick, Crowton, Mike Sanford (though, with the turbulent relationship between Whittingham & Sanford, this seems unlikely), Robert Anae and Steve Kragthorpe (I've heard he's rejuvenated since taking a demotion at LSU to deal with his Parkinson's). But, without any real information out there, it's possible none of these candidates are realistic options and merely smoke screens.
If I had to take a guess, Whittingham has his guy and is just waiting for signing day to come before making an announcement so that recruits don't waver. Of course, I question that practice considering it sounds a bit dishonest, especially if they're openly telling recruits Roderick will be here next year, which isn't a guarantee if he isn't promoted to the offensive coordinator position.
Of course, it's entirely possible Whittingham just doesn't have a guy yet and is thoroughly vetting the candidates and is too busy shoring up the final weeks of recruiting to be bothered with going through the process of naming a new coordinator at this time.
So, who knows. I'm guessing, though, if Whittingham does make an announcement soon, and it's Roderick, the feeling is going to be underwhelming - even if, last month, most fans here voted for him.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You're right
If it is in fact Roderick, why not just name him OC already? I was one of those who support having him as the next OC, but I’ll definitely be disappointed if they wait till after Signing Day to announce it. Why wait? The wait alone makes me think it’s not Roderick though.
by Carter Crosland on Jan 18, 2012 5:54 AM MST via Android app reply actions
Making this worse
Is that we’re waiting in silence while the Pac-12 coaching arms race unfolds before our very eyes. Pac-12 teams are making impressive hires right and left and we’re still waiting…
But at least we’re not Cal.
So -called impressive hires . . .
Sometimes pan out and sometimes do not. The only hire that is impressive is a couple years in aand you’re kicking ass because of an obvious move.
We have a decent program, we should find an adequate OC. An adequate OC with our defense will win more than 8 games annually.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman
"I'm not upset about the U allegations," tweeted Cleveland Indians closer Chris Perez, who pitched at Miami. "I'm mad we didn't win anything while we were cheating."
Except this year.
Dolphins and sharks are natural enemies. Dolphins are like, "Quit eating us," and sharks are like, "Stop smiling all the time, you morons."
Sort-of-daily sort-of-funny sort-of-thoughts at danoftheday.com
We did fine
Considering our problems. Yes, we should have won at leats two more games, but considering how much Hays improved in aa conference with great speed at the dfeensicve positions, and with an average O-line (considering injuries), I’d say we did fairly well.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman
"I'm not upset about the U allegations," tweeted Cleveland Indians closer Chris Perez, who pitched at Miami. "I'm mad we didn't win anything while we were cheating."
I agree the season was fine. But Utah didn't win more than 8 games
Maybe you meant “8 games or more” rather than “more than 8 games” and I’m just arguing semantics.
And although I think this was a pretty good year, especially considering the rash of key injuries, I don’t agree with those who say eight wins is the Utes “floor.” Utah had a phenomenal defense this year, and while Whittingham always seems to field a solid defense, it’s not always phenomenal. If we had another year of subpar QB play and it was coupled with a slightly down year for the defense, or a year where the RB isn’t awesome enough to bail out a bad QB, it seems more than reasonable to me that Utah could finish with a lot fewer than 8 wins.
I don’t think 2012 will be that year, mind you. But I don’t think we, as a fan base, can base all our future expectations on the results of one year in the Pac-12. Utah’s situation isn’t static, and neither is the rest of the Pac-12.
Dolphins and sharks are natural enemies. Dolphins are like, "Quit eating us," and sharks are like, "Stop smiling all the time, you morons."
Sort-of-daily sort-of-funny sort-of-thoughts at danoftheday.com
Like I said
A couple years after the hire, you can determine whetehr it was a good investment. Chow at least brough in Hays, without whom we had zilch, and brough him along so Jury is out on him without next year to see can he pull it together.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman
"I'm not upset about the U allegations," tweeted Cleveland Indians closer Chris Perez, who pitched at Miami. "I'm mad we didn't win anything while we were cheating."
Jury's not out on Hays
We know what he is.
A Guy with heart. A Guy who never quits. A Guy who is not a Division 1 QB.
re:
OC Won't be Roderick
And definitely should not be Anae.
Oh and might I add?
I am more concerned with having enough large Offensive linemen that can move, especially at LT.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman
"I'm not upset about the U allegations," tweeted Cleveland Indians closer Chris Perez, who pitched at Miami. "I'm mad we didn't win anything while we were cheating."
Underwhelming list of candidates.
Would have loved to actually see someone not affiliated with Utah, BYU, and/or Whit have been an actual candidate.
They may have focused more on recruiting
So you need a name, or a guy who has amazing contacts in a recruiting hotbed.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."--John Heisman
"I'm not upset about the U allegations," tweeted Cleveland Indians closer Chris Perez, who pitched at Miami. "I'm mad we didn't win anything while we were cheating."
Having the OC in place would have also helped with recruiting
Unless the guy you are going to hire, is someone who is not going to inspire confidence in recruits, or it will me passing up a current coach who has locked up some recruits.
I just have a problem, that Whit seems to always go back to the same, extremely small pool when it comes to assistants.
after norm chow,
most names are going to be underwhelming. I REALLY hope and think that we can do better than Crowton though.
If you like my comments, please visit my blog @ nationofsportsdomination.blogspot.com
by BigBenSportsGuy on Jan 18, 2012 8:43 AM MST reply actions
It's not just that it's not a name Like Chow that makes it underwhelming.
It’s the fact that Whit is going back to the same well. That Whit really seems not to have a large pool of contacts to draw from when it comes to hires.
Not too worried
While the coaching landscape is quite volatile, Whitt may be wise in waiting until the class is signed. There is no need to rush and make the wrong decision. 70 applicants is a lot of info to sift through and process.
At the end of the day, I hope the candidate is someone who will stick around and not just use Utah as a stepping stool, someone who can lights out recruit, a great teacher that instills confidence and technique, and someone that knows Xs and Os and how to call the game in critical situations. Is that asking too much?
I gots the faith.
I think of it this way, in regards to coaching hires: Whit runs a multi-million dollar business and has a huge plate of responsibilities. His ability to keep the search for one of his two ’VP’s (Coordinators) quiet and to deflect pressure from his ‘shareholders’(That’s us) speaks to his steadiness and ability to make the very best decision, rather than the easy decision.
It would be relatively easy to go hire someone with a name people recognize and impress us all. Whit’s silence on the matter tells me that he has instead decided to look for a great OC, the kind of person he can count on to run our offense for a long time. He wants to hire the next big thing, not the last big thing.
by Joseph Silverzweig on Jan 18, 2012 10:57 AM MST reply actions
For my money
Anae and Kragthorpe would be my favorites in the group Jazzy mentioned, then A Rod then following way, way behind would be Sanford then with the worse than worse case scenario being Crowton.
I thought Anae ran a very good offense down south except when he got too focused on the passing game. I don’t read to much into that though because I think pass heavy is the philosophy down there, even donko used to talk about short passes being nothing more than long handoffs. I think when a school makes its mark throwing the ball the fans come to expect it and I think pass heavy is what they expect. With a run first guy like Kyle at the helm Anae should do very well here.
Kragthorpe is experienced and had some good offenses along the way. I wouldn’t hire him as my head coach but I think he makes a good OC.
A Rod probably has his best days ahead of him as an OC but I am nervous about him learning the trade here next year and possibly not taking full advantage of what should be a very talented and experienced offense next year.
Sanford seemed to me to be a guy who was in the right place at the right time rather than being an innovative offensive mind. I think very good talent and a fairly innovative offensive scheme in its day had more to do with the 2003-2004 offensive success than anything he brought to the table. That and the rumors that he and Kyle didn’t get along well make him a no in my book
Finally, even when at his best Crowton used to give you one or two good years before it all went to hell, these days he can’t even give you one or two years.

by 










